===OCR macOS Vision===
===PAGE 1===
drau brougie wetlands dr we place digit daladen toms papery s best dow tas has come about wit residentally
zoned land and he was informed from the Planning Board that it was now out of their hands. He has since sent a letter to both
Representative Benson and Senator Flanagan, noted that this major construction of solar panels is going to be right outside his kitchen
window and doesn't how this can be done. He was advised by Senator Flanagan that this is not a state issue but a local issue and
suggested that he take it up with the Board of Selectmen and Town Clerk. Doesn't understand why it's being placed right outside his
property and doesn't understand where we're at here. Would like to have an audience with the board in the future on how this came
about. Seems that today, he's the sacrificial lamb and doesn't understand what the Planning Board is saying, questioning where does
he go, who can he talk to. This is pretty massive construction that they're talking about.
Paula did investigate after the Planning Board meeting and met with Marion Benson, Planning Director, under Chapter 40A Section 3,
there is a requirement right now according to the by law that we've adopted, these farms have a "by right" ability to place these
regardless of zoning. Note that there is a commercial component of the property and know that they've increased the buffer to 190
feet. However, unclear whether it's a blanket "by right" clause, know that under our by-law there is no provision that establishes areas
for this type of farm. Paula has called Steve Marsden who was the prior Chair on the Green Community Task Force and Marion is
following up with Senator Flanagan. The question that Paula had with Marion earlier was whether there was anything we could do with
regards to this applicant and according to her, there is not. Noted that there is now a question on whether the large solar farms fall
under Chapter 40A, Section 3 and we, as a community, need to look at this.
Dave noted that as this is not on our agenda, we will need to schedule discussion on this for a future date, one that would involve the
Planning Board.
Kerry, next week we are scheduled to meet with the Planning Board on the Summer Street Overlay and perhaps we could fit this in.
Paula would also like to get the input from Town Counsel on whether this commercial type of photovoltaic farm can be put in a
residential area.
John Whelan of 526 West Townsend Road, commented that when he moved into town 10 years ago, they knew that they had the
possibility of someone developing near us and as such they've spent thousands of dollars in designing their property and the second
floor was designed to overlook their property. Now they will be at the top of his property looking out over 15 acres of solar arrays. That
doesn't belong in a residential neighborhood, you don't clear cut in a residential neighborhood, it's all about the money they're going to
get back from the town, they're about making a profit in short term. He's in it for the long haul and really doesn't appreciate that this can
be allowed in a residential area. Kerry will discuss this with Town Counsel and the Planning Director tomorrow.
Annekje Van de Water, resident of Lunenburg, daughter is a student @ Passios Elementary School and a member of Pro Athletics in
Leominster are requesting permission to have a boot drive for Saturday, November 1gth; everyone would wear white or reflective vests.
The group is scheduled to go to Atlanta and Dallas Texas for cheering competitions; all members are from the tri-town area and they
need to raise between $10k to $15k in order to go to these competitions. They are the only team this young to complete from this area
in Dallas.
Dave's concern is that right now, we're looking at two boot drives in the month of November, possibly three and worries about
charitable burnout.
Tom commented that you don't actually stop people, it's voluntary, no requirement to give. Hear Dave's concerns and it's either that or
we start "cherry picking" and really doesn't have an issue with allowing these functions.
Dave commented that the other group requests are a town wide offering versus this function.
Ernie, agrees with Mr. Alonzo but also has safety concerns and think they have to look at the hazards and have a real good plan.
Suggested traffic cones, something to highlight their being there as he doesn't want to see anyone hurt, very dangerous intersection,
some cautions that have to be done there. Noted that the board may want to address scheduling times and how many can be done in a
months period and where etc.
Annekje noted that this is a non-profit organization.
Steve doesn't have a strong feeling either way, would request that they all have reflective vests on. Paula shares Mr. Matthews
concerns and noted that we may want to look at a policy to look at specifying procedures and standards.
Dave asked for a recommendation from the board.
===PAGE 2===
with the same restrictions. Any container; bags, boxes, barrels, trashcans, tarps, flower pots, etc., must be removed and taken by the
resident. No household garbage, trash, or rubbish of any kind will be accepted. No materials within the Landtill area; sand, stone,
gravel, etc. are to be given away or sold. Access will be restricted to the disposal area. Commercial landscapers will not be allowed to
dump. Open to Lunenburg residents only. Travel permitted only on Town easement. No trespassing on Tri-town Landing Development.
Storm debris will also be accepted
2. Last two HHW Events held at the DEVENS REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS PRODUCTS COLLECTION CENTER, 9
Cook St., Devens - www.DevensHHW.com - (978) 501-3943 - fees for disposal are scheduled for Wednesday, December 7th & the
following Saturday, December 10th @ 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM (weather permitting. OPEN TO RESIDENTS AND PRE-REGISTERED
BUSINESSES OF MEMBER TOWNS ONLY, Ayer - Bolton - Devens - Groton - Harvard - Lancaster - Littleton - Lunenburg -
Townsend. Proof of residency is required.
3. Reminder to residents on the "BlackBoard Connect" service - directed to the Town's website for changes/and information for
notitications through the Blackboard Connect service.
APPOINTMENTS
1. MRPC Representative to review MPO Sub-Region Representative - George Snow, Planner, from Montachusett Regional
Planning Commission, presented the attached handouts with intormation on the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Reviewed the
MPO Sub-region selection process per the attached handout. George also presented a CD on the Regional Transportation Plan.
Kerry questioned if this is a new position as currently Ayer is the representative for this sub-region. Noted that this is the funding area
where we will be looking to for the Summer Street improvements so it would be ideal if Lunenburg would have the representative at this
point. All four communities in the sub region meet and decide who will be the representative and according to George, MRPC facilitates
the process and sets up the meeting between the four communities. Next step for the town is to submit one name for consideration.
Board will address this at their meeting next week. MRPC would like to have the meeting for the MPO Selection sometime in January
2012.
CURRENT BUSINESS
1. 6:15 p.m. Gerry Galena, Casella Waste Management - Kerry informed the board that the only trucks running in town on Monday
are tor private subscriptions. About a month ago, Casella asked about the possibility of providing town service Monday - Friday, rather
than the current Tuesday - Friday. Another reason is that there are a number of residents who have stated they would come over to
the town's program if it was offered on Monday.
She has asked around to determine why the Town went Tuesday - Friday, instead of Monday - Friday, and haven't found anything
more than it was easier to keep track of who was in town. She noted that we struggle with funding this program each year, so anything
reasonably done to increase participation, on its face seems like a good idea. She has advised Casella that if any change is agreed to,
Casella would be 100% responsible for directly notifying residents.
Gerry Galena was present with representatives from Casella to discuss the possibility of providing service Monday through Friday
instead of the present schedule of Tuesday through Friday. The main reason given was that the routes based upon 4-day service are
too long and the driver isn't able to finish up until 4:30 - 5:00 p.m., rather than 3:30 - 4:00 p.m., which is Casella's preference. Casella
stated that they now have the new split trucks and noted that this is a safety issue. Casella doesn't want trucks out during twiliaht
and/or peak commuting hours. Their trucks are going back to Auburn and would like to have their trucks off the road by 2:00 PM. Will
let everyone know before time, by flyers, newspapers town website and are willing to go back to pick up those residents that may be
missed during the changes. Operate now from 7:00 to 4:30 Tuesday through Friday and would like to change to 7:00 to 2:00 Monday
through Friday.
Center of Town would be the Monday route, and some of the stops from Friday may change over to Monday, they would like to get
congested area of the town picked up on Mondays. Most of the changes will be a one day change, if they're on Wednesday now, they
===PAGE 3===
private hauler. May gain some subscribers and doesn't really see an impact as they've designed the Monday pickup to be the center of
town. Longest road that they'd be doing on Monday will be all of Leominster Road. Operationally they're trying to get out of town before
the school buses, by 1:00 to 1:30 pm, would be best to get the trucks off the roads.
Monday Holidays would just throw the schedule off by one day, Monday would go to Tuesday etc., and Friday would be on Saturday.
Kerry would like the counts taken over a period of time as the biggest problem is knowing the number that actually participate in order
to competitively price the cost of the program. Paula questioned if there would be a way to do two different counts, one for trash and
another for recycling. Casella could do this but would have to be done over a period of time, couldn't be done in the same week.
Tom has no problem with the change but doesn't think December 1s' gives enough time, should be looking at 30 days and would like to
have the counts for a set period, first two weeks for a couple of months, 5 to 6 months. Would like to see a range as they may change
seasonally etc. Questioned when you bid this, didn't this come up to you then. Gerry noted that Casella didn't have the split truck then
but now with the split truck the routes take longer and the reason is just trying to get the trucks off the road as soon as possible.
Board's biggest concern is that we absolutely have to notify as many people as we can.
Casella will develop a plan to present to Kerry for the board and would like to shoot for January 1st. They will also send out fiyers with
Kerry would like to have the counts two weeks for each, a quarter. Would like to think about this a little bit more.
Paula would like to have it done more than once a quarter and Kerry suggested monthly for the rest of this fiscal year and then go to
quarterly.
Board overall doesn't have a problem with the change and Kerry will put something in writing for the board to act on.
2. Authorize BAN Sale, $1,300,000. for DPW Renovation Expansion Project - Treasurer/Tax Collector, Jeff Ugalde submitted a
Bond Anticipation Note for the DPW Facility Remodeling for total $1,300,000.00 for the board's authorization. The Town has already
paid over about $300,000 and as they plan on being able to have the project completed by the end of the year this finaning is needed
in order to get the contractor paid in a timely manner Tom move to authorize the sale of Bond Anticipation Notes in the amount of
$1,300,000, dated November 9, 2011 to mature on June 29, 2012 to Eastern Bank at a rate of 0.80% and to authorize execution of all
documents necessary to complete the sale, Steve seconded, voted unanimously to approve. Documents signed by board.
3. Minutes - Board of Selectmen Regular session for 11.1.2011 reviewed and signed
Warrants - #10P 12, 11/7/2011 - $654,412.79, #28 12, 11/8/2011 - $294,888.53 and #29 12, 12/11/2011 - $148,805.83 reviewed
and signed.
Action File Issues - none
4. Committee Reports -
> Tom, Finance Committee meets this Thursday. Noted that there was a meeting of the Broadband Connect last night and about
30,000 poles will be installed for the "backbone" and will need to be licensed by the owner, be it verizon or comcast. The project is
on track, next year will be most of the construction and getting to residents and businesses. July of 2013 is when it is expected to
be completed by, will be beneficial to the whole state.
• Paula noted that there was a number of issues addressed at the Planning Board meeting on the design standard language. A
slaised here at 6. A.
public hearing will be held on November 21st on both of the zoning articles that have been presented. Televised here at 6:30
Noted that the draft that was submitted will be changing and the board will like to have copies when we receive. Also discussed
was the Tri-Town project, which is commencing with Building #3 and that they will be discussing the fire access to the property.
Concern is about the photovoltaic project and the impact that the TriTown project will have on the towns' landfill photovoltaic
Kerry commented that the water pressure was sufficient for the first two buildings, the issue is that the water from Fitchburg goes
through a meter pit. The infrastructure needs to be phased up to increase the water pressure. Approximately about a couple of
===PAGE 4===
6. Town Manager Reports - Kerry reviewed the attached summary on the future meeting agenda's.
• Streetlight update, due to the storm we haven't been able to get out to verify and will place on the agenda for next week or the
week following.
• Storm related activities/storm debris; President Obama provided a Presidential Disaster Declaration for a portion of MA, including
Worcester County on November 1, 2011. This declaration means that we are eligible for federal emergency assistance, but not for
expense reimbursement. The assistance we have received to date is 70 hours' worth of work from bucket truck crews. The crews
have been invaluable since we do not have any bucket trucks in our fleet. To date, we have had 1 - 3 trucks in town, since mid-
week. Our DPW crew has been working with the bucket trucks, as they just remove the hangers. The crews have been out
working this week and the cost for this 70 hours of work is being paid 100% by FEMA.
Preliminary Damage Assessment teams are being assigned to survey affected communities to quantify total damage and estimate
preliminary costs, in an attempt to determine whether or not the required thresholds are met, which would qualify us for FEMA
reimbursement 75%. Prior to this determination made, any debris removal costs would be borne 100% by the town. As such, we
are not removing any debris at this time. As you know, the Landfill has been open on Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. for
debris drop off, this will continue until November 19'.
At this time, we estimate 5,000 - 7,500 cubic yards of storm debris, on both public and private property. If this is accurate, total
removal costs would be $155,000 - $232,500. If FEMA reimburses 75%, the remaining cost to the Town would be $38,750 -
$58,125. Since this funding is not included in the FY12 budget, I would be looking for BOS endorsement prior to
proceeding. There is a statewide contract we could use, which would satisfy all procurement requirements, and we are prepared to
move forward as soon as possible.
Dave noted that some other town's are doing the clean-up and questioned whether they are assuming this at their own costs.
According to Kerry and based upon the guidelines that have been put together, that work wouldn't be eligible for reimbursements.
lom questioned it we have any estimate on when MEMA will be making a determination and Kerry believes that they will be doing
this, this week. Steve questioned whether it would be prudent to utilize the State Bid as well as our DPW to continue to do debris
removal. Kerry noted that they were out there this weekend and are out there doing what they can do and will continue in the
debris removal.
Paula noted that we really have to encourage residents to bring it to the landfill during the "yard waste days" if they are able to and
realize that we have to clean up the debris, questioned whether the Town Manager can address where we are going to get the
funding. Per Kerry would recommend that we use the snow and ice appropriation, also the 12½% that we're expecting from the
State for the reimbursement from the 2008 ice storm. Add discussion on this to next week's agenda.
OLD BUSINESS
1. Review of Warrant Articles for Special Town Meeting - Kerry prepared a schedule to review the articles at future board
meetings.
Dave would like to have the Stretch Code article in before the the zoning articles. Public Hearing from the Green Communities Task
Force is scheduled for November 17%h.
Tom will be absent for the 11/22/11 meeting
Kerry informed the board that on October 6, 2011, she received the attached bill from Attorney Dan Hill, and dated July 11, 2011, which
is largely for reimbursement of copying costs associated with the Superior Court filing (Hollis Hills). Upon receipt, she contacted
Attorney Hill to inquire as to why we had just now received this bill and was advised by him that it was sent out in July and he did not
know why it had not been received earlier. The Town Accountant can only pay prior year bills up to July 15 of the following fiscal year.
Any payments thereafter must be approved by Town Meeting, by a 9/10 majority. In order to fund this bill, she suggests reducing the
FY12 appropriation for Legal Services from $125,000, by $8,265, to $116,735. As such, this article should be taken up after the FY12
Budget Adjustment Article. Tom recommend approval, Paula seconded, voted unanimously.
Article D is a request to rescind the sum of $456,927.87, the remaining authorization, from Article 16 of the May 6, 2006 Annual Town
Meeting Warrant for engineering, permitting, and construction of drinking water and wastewater improvements at Meadow Woods Mobile
===PAGE 5===
November 15, 2011
November 22, 2011
Being no further business board voted unanimously to adjourn Regular Session at 8:35 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Laura Caron-Gustus, Chief Administrative Assistant
Board of Selectmen
===PAGE 6===
There are five core functions of an MPO:
1. Establish and manage a fair and impartial setting for effective regional decision making.
2.
Use data and planning methods to generate and evaluate transportation improvement options and alternatives.
3. Develop and update a fiscally-constrained Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) for the metropolitan area
covering a planning horizon of at least twenty years.
4. Develop a fiscally-constrained Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) of improvements to achieve area
goals.
5. Involve the general public and all significantly affected sub-groups in the four essential functions listed above.
In creating the requirements for MPOs, Congress identified several key reasons why MPOs are essential:
1. Transportation investment means allocating scarce federal and other transportation funding resources
appropriately;
2. Planning needs to reflect the region's shared vision for its future;
3. Adequate transportation planning requires a comprehensive examination of the region's future and investment
alternatives; and
4. An MPO is needed to facilitate collaboration of governments, interested parties, and residents in the planning
process.
MPO staff assists the MPO board by preparing documents, fostering interagency coordination, facilitating public input and
feedback, and managing the planning process. The MPO staff may also provide committees with technical assessments
and evaluations of proposed transportation initiatives. For the Montachusett MPO, the MRPC serves as staff.
A technical advisory committee may also provide recommendations to the board on specific strategies or projects. An
advisory committee may also provide technical analysis, specialized knowledge, and citizen input on specific issues. For
the Montachusett MPO, the Montachusett Joint Transportation Committee (MJG) serves in this capacity.
What are the Major Documents Required of the MPO?
The Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP): The UPWP is a budget and planning tool that lists the transportation tasks
to be performed by the MPO staff. The UPWP reflects local issues and strategic priorities. The UPWP covers a one year
period and is updated annually.
The Long-Range (or Regional) Transportation Plan (LRTP or RTP): The RTP a statement of the ways the region plans to
invest in the transportation system. Per federal regulations, the plan shall include both long-range and short-range
program strategies/actions that lead to the development of an integrated intermodal transportation system that facilitates
the efficient movement of people and goods." The RTP is developed/updated every 4 years.
The plan addresses:
• Policies, strategies, and projects for the future;
• A systems level approach by considering roadways, transit, nonmotorized transportation, and intermodal
connections;
• Projected demand for transportation services over 20 years;
• Regional land use, development, housing, and employment goals and plans;
• Cost estimates and reasonably available financial sources for operation, maintenance, and capital investments.
The RTP must be fiscally constrained; and
• Ways to preserve existing roads and facilities and make efficient use of the existing system.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): In the TIP, the MPO identifies the transportation projects that it plans to
undertake over the next four federal fiscal years. All projects receiving federal funding must be in the TIP. The TIP is the
===PAGE 7===
The voting members of the Montachusett Metropolitan Planning Organization consist of the following officials or their
designees:
• the Secretary and Chief Executive Officer of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation
• the Administrator of the Highway Division of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation
• the Chairman of the Montachusett Regional Planning Commission
• the Chairman of the Montachusett Regional Transit Authority
• the Mayor of the City of Fitchburg
• the Mayor of the City of Gardner
• the Mayor of the City of Leominster
• Four Representatives from the four identified Subregions of towns in the MRPC region
Subregion 1:
Athol, Hubbardston, Petersham, Phillipston, Royalston, Templeton, Winchendon
Subregion 2: Ashburnham, Ashby, Groton, Townsend, Westminster
Subregion 3:
Ayer, Harvard, Lunenburg, Shirley
Subregion 4: Clinton, Lancaster, Sterling
The Montachusett MPO currently meets the second Wednesday of the month at 1:00 PM at MRPC Offices, MART
Garage & Maintenance Facility, 1427R Water Street, Fitchburg, MA 01420. The next scheduled meeting is November 9,
2011.
What is the MPO Subregion Selection Process?
1. MPO staff meets with the Chief Elected Officials (CEO) and solicits from CEO's potential candidates to represent
their subregion on the MPO. At the same time, solicit potential designee for the MPO representative candidate.
2. Convene special meetings or caucuses of CEO's to review, discuss and select subregion MPO representative
and alternate. The alternate will be from a different community than the selected MPO representative.
3. Official designees for the Representative and the Alternate will be identified at the selection/caucus meetings. In
addition, at the meeting the Subregions will seek to determine the process for communication with member
communities regarding MPO proceedings.
The Subregion representative will serve a three (3) year term on the MPO.
What is Needed from Your Community?
1. The name of a Board of Selectmen member willing to serve as the Subregion representative on the MPO.
2.
The name of an official designee (i.e. town planner, DPW superintendent, other town official, etc.) who could
represent the official Subregion representative at a MPO meeting.
A selection/caucus meeting will be scheduled in November/December 2011 at a mutually convenient location.
Please submit any names to:
Brad Harris, MRPC bharris@mrpc.org (978) 345-7376 ext. 311
Sources:
- U.S. Department of Transportation: A Briefing Book for Transportation Decisionmakers, Officials, and Staff
(www.planning.dot.gov/documents/BriefingBook/bbook.htm)
- Wikipedia: Metropolitan planning organization (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_planning_organization)
- MRPC: Montachusett MPO Memorandum of Understanding
- MRPC: Montachusett Metropolitan Planning Organization Subregion Representative Selection Process
===PAGE 8===
Local Receipts
Expenditures
Cherry Sheet Offsets
State & County Assessments
Choice/Charter Assessments
Court Judgement
Ice Storm Deficit
Salary Reserve Approp Adj
Summer Street Article
Cruiser Article
Police Detail Fund Article
Surplus/(Deficit)
$
-
$ 172,660.00
(7,519.00)
(4.00)
$ (71,386.00)
$(90,000.00)
$
$
(3,751.00)
$
$
$
:
$(172,660.00)
$
-
===PAGE 9===
FY10 BUDGETED
FX11 BUDGETED
PROPERTY TAXES
Prior Year Levy Limit
2 1/2% Increase
Estimated New Growth
Debt Exclusions
$
$
$
15,890,966.00
393,855.54
130,170.00
1,012,305.00
$
$
16,418,410.00
407,945.48
188,732.00
991,724.00
$
$
TAXES: Total
17,427,296.54 S
18,006,811.48
STATE PROVIDED FUNDS
Cherry Sheet/State Aid
Police Career Incentive
$
Subtotal State Aid
PROJECTED LOCAL RECEIPTS
Local Receipts
Subtotal Receipts
OTBER REVENUES
Overlay Surplus
Free Cash
Unexpended Articles
$
Borrowing
Stabilization Fund
$
MSBA Reimbursements
ARRA Funding - School
ART 5 5/5/08 (5/1/09 FY10 Recap)
FY2009 Revenue Reduction (5/1/09 FY10 Reca
$
FY10 Unexpended Articles (FY11 Recap)
$
Trust & Special Revenue Funds
Sewer Enterprise
Transfer from Meadow Woods Bett (FY11 Reca
$
Sewer Betterments
$
Water Betterments
Sale of Real Estate Revolving Account
Subtotal Other Revenue S
Other Financing Sources
Capital Improvement Fund
Septic Loan Revenue
$
Enterprise Funds
$
TOTAL REVENUE
100000U09
6,004,013.00
11,495.00
6,015,508.00
$
2,215,343.00
2,215,343.00
$
27,601.81
112,500.00
559,058.00
121,950.00
1,897.00
(174,492.00)
13,409.89
$
30,715.00
155,945.00
726,968.00
$
$
1,575,552.70
10,872.00
$
814,352.54
$
S28,058,924.78
5,976,405.00
5,914.00
5,982,319.00
$
2,432,666.00
2,432,666.00
$
239,841.00
22,785.00
110,000.00
213,252.00
559,057.00
$
$
30,715.00 S
802,490.00
62,779.00
$
2,040,919.00
10,872.00
$
939.495.26 $
.S29,413,082.74
EY2012 REVENUE EXPENDITURE PROJECTION ACTUAL CS (2)11/8/2011
IF FARTHER EVELLO.
FY12 BUDGETED EXPENDITURES
17,017,602.00
Maturing Debt
425,440.00
Interest/Issuance Costs on Debt
425,377.00
Gen Gov Unclassified
977,796.00
General Government
Central Purchasing
18,846,215.00 Protection
Health & Sanitation
Public Assistance
6,001,062.00
Department of Public Works
Schools
6,001,062.00
Library
Recreation
Omnibus Total
2,439,123.00
Changes to FY09 Budget (FY10 Recap)
Changes to FY10 Budget (FY11 Recap)
2,439,123.00
CHERRY SHEET CHARGES
Cherry Sheet Offset
State & County
Choice/Charter Assessments
Changes to FY09 Assessments
$
$
405,000.00
Subtotal CS Charges $
559,057.00
Allow for Abatements/Exemptions
Wore Cty Retirement Assessment
Tax Title
Layoffs
Capital Articles
$
30,715.00
General Fund Articles
Teachers Deferral
803,485.00
May 2008 STM Appropriations
62,781.00
FX09 Articles STM
FY09 Articles ATM
1,861,038.00
Capital Program
Court Judgements
Snow & Ice Deficit
Ice Storm Deficit
10,872.00 Court Judgements
11/30/10 STM Articles
Prior Year Expense
Transfer to Stabilization Fund 11/15
870,032.40 Reeycling Enterprise Deficit
Enterprise Funds
$30,028,342.40
TOTAL EXPENDITURES S
Credit/(Debit)
FY10 BUDGETED
1,771,355.00
892.946.00
2,152,356.00
1,153,128.00
41,612.00
2,230,948.00
64.173.00
103.452.00
1,256,036.00
15,083,297.00
303,099.00
2,500.00
25,054,902.00
(78,038.00)
169,354.89
$
$
360,982.00
135,718.00
567,691.00
(134,287.00)
930,104.00 S
141,583.39 $
528,137.00
$
3,500.00
$
233,950.00
60,580.23
18.108.00 8
4.65425
35,075.00
27,500.00
~ us
$
FY11
115,161.48
814,352.54
28,058,924.78
S0.00
===PAGE 10===
Bill To:
Town of Lunenburg
Zoning Board of Appeals
Ritter Memorial Building
960 Mass Ave.
Lunenburg, MA 01462
Matter: Hollis Hills 40B
Date of Service
6/1/2011
6/3/2011
6/7/2011
6/8/2011
6/9/2011
6/15/2011
6/17/2011
6/30/2011
5/3/2011
6/7/2011
6/16/2011
6/23/2011
6/24/2011
6/27/2011
6/27/2011
Description
DCH
Letter to HAC re: status report; emails re: scheduling
negotiation meeting.
Emails re: scheduling negotiation meeting.
Telephone conference with Appeals Court re: contents of
appendix; emails with OC re: same.
Draft appellate brief; prepare appendix.
Draft appellate brief.
DCH
Emails with K. Speidel re: scheduling meeting.
DCH
Emails re: scheduling meeting with developer.
DCH Emails with K. Speidel re: settlement meeting; telephone
conference with OC re: status report to HAC; draft status
report.
EXPENSES
Courier expense
Courier expense
Printing expense for Superior Court
Courier expense
Printing expense, appellate brief and record appendix
Courier expense
Courier expense
Hours
0.3
0.2
0.5
Rate
185.00
185.00
185.00
185.00
185.00
185.00
185.00
185.00
14.00
14.00
5,745.65
14.00
429.00
42.00
17.00
Invoice Total
Thank you for your business.
-
Amount
55.50
37.00
92.50
925.00
573.50
18.50
37.00
222.00
14.00
14.00
5,745.65
14.00
429.00
42.00
17.00
===PAGE 11===
Bill To:
Town of Lunenburg
Zoning Board of Appeals
Ritter Memorial Building
960 Mass Ave.
Lunenburg, MA 01462
Date of Service
6/27/2011
7/6/2011
7/6/2011
Matter: Hollis Hills 40B
•
Description
Courier expense
FDX#822158615000794
FDX#822158615000800
Total Reimbursable Expenses
Hours
Rate
17.00
5.66
5.66
Amount
17.00
5.66
5.66
6,303.97
Invoice Total
$8,264.97
Thank you for your business.
-
-