===OCR macOS Vision===
===PAGE 1===
ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. Yard Waste Days - The Lunenburg Landfill, off of Youngs Road will be open for consecutive Saturdays, OCTOBER 15TH -
clippings, bark much, wood chips, leaves, brush (with a diaper of yard weed orches burg ted engi. Serabe and plan tras,
with the same restrictions. Any container; bags, boxes, barrels, trashcans, tarps, flower pots, etc., must be removed and taken by the
resident. No household garbage, trash, or rubbish of any kind will be accepted. No materials within the Landfill area; sand, stone
gravel, etc. are to be given away or sold. Access will be restricted to the disposal area. Commercial landscapers will not be allowed to
dump. Open to Lunenburg residents only. Travel permitted only on Town easement. No trespassing on Tri-town Landing Development.
Board will discuss option of extending the dates at their next meeting on November 11th, Storm debris will also be accepted.
2. Last two HHW Events held at the DEVENS REGIONAL HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS PRODUCTS COLLECTION CENTER for
2011 @ 9 Cook St., Devens - www.DevensHHW.com - (978) 501-3943 - fees for disposal are scheduled for Wednesday, December
7th & the following Saturday, December 10th @ 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM (weather permitting. OPEN TO RESIDENTS AND PRE-
REGISTERED BUSINESSES OF MEMBER TOWNS ONLY, Ayer - Bolton - Devens - Groton - Harvard - Lancaster - Littleton -
Lunenburg - Townsend. Proof of residency is required.
APPOINTMENTS
1. 7:00 PM Classification Hearing, Establish Tax Rate for FY12 - Town of Lunenburg, Public Hearing Notice, The Board of
Selectmen for the Town of Lunenburg will hold a Public Hearing as required by M.G.L. Chapter 40, §56, on the issue of allocating the
local property tax levy among the four classes of real and personal property for FY'12. This hearing will be held on November 15, 2011
@ 7:00 PM in the Joseph F. Bilotta Conference Room, 2nd floor, Town Hall, 17 Main Street, Lunenburg, MA. David J. Matthews,
Chairman, Board of Selectmen. Harald Scheid, Regional Assessor was present and introduced Matthew Lapini (new Assessor to the
oaro. Provided me attached intormation on
certification, but if for some reason had to alter the tax rate revenue, may alter tax rate as we have shown here. Tom move to adopt a
unified tax rate as presented, Steve seconded, voted unanimously.
2. 7:30 PM Review Alternative Analysis for Summer Redesign, Joint Session with Planning Board - Trish Domigan from VHB
presented a Power Point presentation of the Summer Street Transportation Improvements and reviewed the scope of alternative
analysis that included site walks with the communities of Fitchburg & Leominster. Look at traffic counts, key intersections, whether
traffic signals are needed and traffic data collections at key intersections in the three communities.
The Summer Street Renovation Project spans the three communities of Lunenburg, Fitchburg, and Leominster. The corridor of the
road that is being designed runs from Kings Corner in Leominster, through Lunenburg to John Fitch Highway in Fitchburg. Three
options were presented in rebuilding the road in Lunenburg. Patricia Dornigan, the Senior Project Manager for Vanasse Hangen
Brustlin (VHB) was present as well as associates, Laura Castelli, in charge of traffic assessment and analysis, and Steve Derdiarian
who worked on landscaping options for the project presented these options to the board.
Trish explained that there are no traffic signals, and very little signage along the road and that the town should consider ameliorating
this. Another concern was the residential driveways along the road that could slow trattic such as Graham Street and Youngs Road.
Youngs Road now looks more like an industrial area with all the concrete around it, but we could turn it into something that is
pedestrian friendly and bike friendly. Also noted was that Whalom Road has quite a bit of extra pavement and we could realign the
intersection to pick up landscaping in that area. Graham Street needs a realignment of that intersection as well, it comes in at an
oblique angle, people trying to turn have difficulty seeing along that road. We can make the road stop perpendicular to Summer Street
so that this sight line would be improved. Noted, that because of the railroad tracks they see limited opportunities for development on
that side of the roadway.
===PAGE 2===
Steve noted his concerns on the intersection of Graham Street/Summer Street and the landscaping proposed and per Trish, they can
look at this and noted that they do look at site lines in re-designing intersections. The "bike paths" are actually along the roadway
separated by lines, shoulder area along the roadway.
Paula questioned the "overlay district bylaw" being proposed for the STM and whether there are opportunities to develop and entice
commercial/industrial growth along that roadway.
Toby Bakaysa (Planning Board Chair) commented on the number of residential projects and what they were looking for to attract small
businesses, restaurants; no large scale store, looking for neighborhood friendly developments/establishments
Paula questioned if the Planning Board identified how much potential development could occur in this area that is currently zoned
commercial or retail. What's the build-out for the retail commercial spaces from a planning standpoint down the road.
Toby noted that at this time they haven't looked at potential economic development growth in this district. We're hoping that the
standards that are within the overlay district would give developers guidelines of what Lunenburg wants. Noted that it's really hard to
suppose the potential, but difficult to answer, all he can say is that they are trying to put a neighborhood feel for that particular area.
Tom commented that it's the chicken or the egg; what you put there would determine the type of development that would attract
neighborhood type of establishments.
Paula's concern is that in going to just two lanes and eliminate turning areas may deter commercial development in that area.
Dave commented that the three lanes with the center turn lane would allow more possibilities in the future, questioned whether there
were any discussions with the DPW Director on maintenance of this proposal for sidewalks/plantings/trees.
Toby's perspective is that he would prefer the turning lane option and that they are trying to eliminate parking the front of the
establishments to the side and to the rear.
According to Kerry, we are out of money at this point, which we always get to the point where we are out of money. This is the end of
the work that the VHB will be doing to put together this conceptual plan, and now we need to do some additional analysis and
determine what size makes the most sense. We can follow up with the DPW and find out long-term maintenance, but at this point we
need to wait for the design money for this project before we can move forward. Senator Jennifer Flanagan has been campaigning to
insert the design funds into the basic bond for construction, and it is expected that sometime between now and the end of the year it
will be determined how much money will be found for the design of this project through the state. At that point the town must determine
which concept it will work with.
According to Kerry, we are out of money at this point, which we always get to the point where we are out of money. This is the end of
the work that the VHB will be doing to put together this conceptual plan, and now we need to do some additional analysis and
letermine what size makes the most sense. We can tollow up with the DPW and tind out lond-term maintenance.
need to wait for the design money far this project before we can move forward. Senator Jenniler Flanagan has been campaigning to
insert the design funds into the basic bond for construction, and it is expected that sometime between now and the end of the year it
will be determined how much money will be found for the design of this project through the state. Hopefully, we'll be able to secure 20%
design funds in order to move forward as we need to be at this point before MRPC will include in their plans. At that point the town
must determine which concept it will work with; between now and the end of the calendar year we need to tie up what we see for future
development.
CURRENT BUSINESS
1. Review Update Statement of Interest, School Building - John Londa, Director of Facilities of Lunenburg Public Schools
presented the attached Statement of Interest Recertification Information for FY11 for consideration in FY2012. Superintendent of
Schools and School Committee have signed off and are now asking for the Board of Selectmen to sign as well.
Paula moved to recertify the Statement of Interest, Steve seconded, voted unanimously. Kerry signed
2. Discussion regarding Solar Farms - Kerry contacted Town Counsel to determine whether or not the Town could have adopted a
Solar Bylaw that restricted commercial solar arrays to commercially zoned property, and still be in compliance with MGL. She was
advised by Joel Bard that Chapter 40A does allow us the right to restrict the placement of solar arrays. MG only requires that each
===PAGE 3===
Dave noted that this is a major issue, but not an issue that this board can deal with. The bylaw that exists in this town doesn't prohibit
them by-right.
Paula commented that we should take ourselves out of this and direct it back to the Planning Board, noted the language in the bylaw
that the town has adopted
According to Kerry, Attorney Bard did review the bylaw and noted in his opinion that it is allowed as a right.
John believes that the Board of Selectmen has more power than they think they do, he's still being told by the Planning Board that this
is out of their hand. You cannot extend commercial property into a residential area. Planning Board doesn't believe they need to have
Special Permits for anything because it's "by-right" which is language in the document that we have not adopted.
Toby Bakaysa, Chairman of the Planning Board commented that from a Planning Board perspective we are always willing to look at
our bylaws and try to create bylaws that protect the community. The Town was presented with the by-law and being early adopters,
there are some issues that you don't foresee and we'll go back and ask legal counsel whether there is anyway that we can change
something. He requested approval from the board to contact counsel directly and look at the actions that we can do to protect our
community. This community has asked us on a number of occasions to bring commercial development to our community and overall,
this is a clean commercial project. Noted that we have limited cell towers placement in town to commercial / industrial areas as well as
adult entertainment.
Steve questioned whether the board is considering any other solar/wind projects and according to Toby, none other than the town's
proposed array on the old landfill.
Paula pointed out that this is a commercial entity in a residential zone is a valid point and it was her impression that this bylaw was to
be for residential homes and not commercial. She does not want to diminish the concerns of the residential property owners.
Tom has read our existing bylaw versus the model that the state now has, our bylaw makes the distinction between residential and
commercial projects and would like to see that this is clarified by town counsel noted that the Planning Board may have more authority
than they may be aware of. Would concur with Paula to allow you access to town counsel for clarification on the rules. Per Toby it
really goes towards Zoning which would go through the Zoning Officer. Would like to ask for specific questions from both the residents
and the Board of Selectmen and would like to have these provided within the next week so that we can make the best use of town
counsel.
Dave commented that he is in favor of green development, but when you're clear cutting 20 acres of land to put up solar arrays, does it
still make it "green".
John also commented that in the town's bylaws for Development Plan Review, "J" & "K" believes that there is a lot more that needs to
be discussed and questioned whether if there is going to be a building permit issued.
Per Toby as of right now, this project is ready to move forward and noted that you need to be concious of what other type of
development that could there, they could put a 40B development in there. Just because this goes away, it doesn't mean that another
type of development could go there. Noted that the Planning Board has a bylaw right now for the STM on design standards and would
encourage people to attend the public hearings and town meetings to hear the information of the bylaw changes. According to Toby,
this project has gone through the Conservation Commission and it's Paula's understanding that there is an Order of Conditions that
have been written for this project. According to Toby, this project went through the site plan review process and not the development
planning review process.
Paula would like to have counsel questioned on whether this is ready to proceed and Toby recommended that the Zoning Officer is
also involved in this discussion with counsel.
Tom would like to request that this project moving forward is held until that determination has been made and per Kerry, the Zoning
Official will not be acting on any permit until that question has been answered by Town Counsel.
3. Minutes - Board of Selectmen Regular session for 11/8/11 reviewed and signed
Warrants - #30 12, 11/15/11 - $151,737.76 and #9P12RA, 10/31/11 $506.48 reviewed and signed.
===PAGE 4===
......
debris clearing efforts that we were to undertake would be done "at risk" and we could potentially be responsible for 100% of those
costs. Hoping to hear from them by the end of the week, but have nothing definitive.
Dave noted that if property owners have the ability to clean their property and utilize the landfill they should, and we will be looking at
extending the opening of the landfill, excluding the Thanksgiving day weekend, board will discuss this further on next Tuesday.
OLD BUSINESS
1. Review Warrant Articles for Special Town Meeting -
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS/RESIGNATIONS
1. Resignation: Troy Daniels, Board of Health (elected office) -
2. Resignation: Susan Szocik, Lunenburg Housing Authority (elected office) -
Kerry informed the board of the resignations of Troy Daniels and Susan Szocik. Reviewed the process as outlined in the Town Charter;
minimum advertising of 10 days and the respective bodies will convene a joint meeting of these committees/boards with the Board of
Selectmen. An appointment will be made to fill the vacancy until the next election. Currently we have received one applicant for the
Housing Authority vacancy. These vacancies have been posted on the website and in Town Hall.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
UPCOMING MEETING SCHEDULE
Being no further business board voted unanimously to adjourn Regular Session at 9:07 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Laura Caron-Gustus, Chief Administrative Assistant
Board of Selectmen
===PAGE 5===
Lunenburg Board of Assessors
Fiscal Year 2012
E
PERCENTAGE
89.9729%
0.0000%
5.6704%
1.8201%
2.5365%
100.0000%
R & 0%
89.9729%
CIP %
10.0271%
emption
Res
89.9729
89.8727
89.7724
89.6721
89.5719
89.4716
89.3713
89.2710
89.1708
89.0705
88.9702
88.8700
88.7697
88.6694
88.5691
88.4689
Share Percentages
OS
Com
Total
0.0000
5.6704 1.8201 2.5365 100.0000
Res
16,974,1740
0.0000
5.7271 1.8383
2.5619
100.0000
16,955,257
0.0000
5.7838
1.8565
2.5873
100.0000
16,936,340
0.0000
5.8405
1.8747
2.6126
:100.0000
16,917,423
0
0.0000
5.8972
1.8929
2.6380
100.0000
16,898,506
0.0000
5.9539
1.9111
2.6634
100.0000
16,879,590
0
0.0000
6.0106 1.9293
2.6887
100.0000
16,860,673
0.0000
6.0673
1.9475
2.7141
100.0000
16,841,756
0
00000
6.1240
1.9657
|2.7395
100.0000
16,822,839
0
0.0000
6.1807
1.9839
2.7648
100.0000
16,803,922
0.0000
6.2374
2.0021
2.7902
100.0000
16,785,005
0.0000
6.2941
2.0203
2.8156
100.0000
16,766,088
0.0000
6.3508
2.0385
2.8409
100.0000
16,747,171
0.0000
6.4076
2.0567
2.8663
100.0000
16,728,254
0.0000
6.4643 2.0749
2.8917
:100.0000
10.0000
16,709,337
6.5210 2.0931
2.9170
100.0000
16,690,420
Levy Amounts
Com
Ind
PP
1,069,770 343,381
478,542
1,080,468
346,815
483,327
1,091,166
350,248
488,113
1,101,863
353,682
492,898
1,112,561
357,116
497,684
1,123,259
360,550
502,469
1,133,956
363,984
507,254
1,144,654
367,417
512,040
1,155,352
370,851
516,825
1,166,049
374,285
521,611
1,176,747
377,719
526,396
1,187,445
381,153
531,181
1,198,143
384,586
535,967
1,208,840
388,020
540,752
1,219,538
391,454
545,538
1,230,236
394,888
550,323
Estimated Tax Rates
Total
Res
os Com
Ind
PP
18,865,867 16.83
16.83 16.83
16.83
18,865,867
16.81
17.00
17.00
17.00
18,865,867
16.79
17.17
17.17
17.17
18,865,867
16.77
17.33
|17.33
17.33
18,865,867
16.75
17.50
17.50
17.50
18,865,867
16.74
17.67
|17.67
|17.67
18,865,867
16.72
17.84
17.84
17.84
18,865,867
16.70
18.01
18.01
18.01
18,865,867
18,865,867
18,865,867
18,865,867
18,865,867
18,865,867
18,865,867
18,865,867
16.68
16.66
16.64
16.62
16.60
16.59
16.57
16.55
18.18
18.18
18.18
18.34
18.34
18.34
18.51
18.51
18.51
18.68
18.68
18.68
18.85
18.85
18.85
19.02
19.02
19.02
19.19
19.19
19.19
19.35
19.35
19.35
===PAGE 6===
Res
88.3686
88.2683
88.1681
88.0678
87.9675
87.8673
87.7670
87.6667
87.5664
87.4662
87.3659
87.2656
87.1654
87.0651
86.9648
86.8645
86.7643
86.6640
86.5637
86.4635
86.3632
86.2629
86.1626
86.0624
85.9621
85.8618
85.7616
85.6613
85.5610
85.4608
85.3605
85.2602
85,1599
85.0597
84.9594
Share Percentages
OS
iiii?
Com
Ind
PP
Total
Res
6.5777
(2.1113
|2.9424 100.0000 16,671,503
6.6344
|2.1295
2.9678 100.0000 16,652,586
6.6911
2.1477 |2.9931 100.0000
16,633,669
6.7478
2.1659 3.0185 100.0000
16,614,753
0.0000
6.8045
2.1841 3.0439 100.0000
16,595,836
0.0000
6.8612
2.2023 |3.0692 100.0000 16,576,919
0.0000
6.9179
2.2205 3.0946 100.0000 16,558,002
0.0000
6.9746
2.2387 3.1200 100.0000
16,539,085
0.0000
7.0313
2.2569 3.1453|100.0000
16,520,168
0.0000
7.0880 2.2751 3.1707 100.0000
16,501,251
0.0000
7.1447 2.2933 3.1961 |100.0000
16,482,334
0.0000
7.2014 2.3115 3.2214 100.0000
16,463,417
0.0000
7.2581 2.3297 3.2468 100.0000
16,444,500
0.0000
7.3148
2.3480
3.2721 |100.0000
16,425,583
0.0000
7.3715
2.3662
3.2975 100.0000
16,406,666
0.0000
7.4282
2.3844
3.3229|100.0000
16,387,749
0.0000
7.4849|2.4026
3.3482 100.0000 16,368,832
0.0000
7.5416 2.4208 3.3736 100.0000 16,349,916
0.0000
7.5983 |
2.4390
3.3990
|100.0000
16,330,999
0.0000
7.6550 2.4572 3.4243 |100.0000 16,312,082
,0.0000
7.7117 2.4754 3.4497
100.0000
16,293,165
0.0000
7.7684
2.4936 3.4751
100.0000
16,274,248
0.0000
7.8252฿
2.5118
3.5004
100.0000
16,255,331
0.0000
7.8819
2.5300 |
3.5258
100.0000
16,236,414
0.0000
7.9386
2.5482
3.5512
100.0000
16,217,497
0.0000
7.9953
2.5664 |
3.5765 100.0000
16,198,580
0.0000
8.0520
2.5846 |3.6019 100.0000
16,179,663
0.0000
8.1087
2.6028 3.6273 100.0000
16,160,746
0.0000
8.1654
2.6210 3.6526 |100.0000
16,141,829
0.0000
8.2221
2.6392 3.6780 100.0000
16,122,912
0.0000
8.2788 2.6574 3.7034
:100.0000
16,103,995
0.0000
8.3355 !
2.6756
3.7287
100.0000
16,085,079
0.0000
8.3922
2.6938
3.7541
100.0000
16,066,162
0.0000
8.4489
2.7120 3.7795
100.0000
16,047,245
0.0000
8.5056 2.7302
3.8048
:100.0000
16,028,328
os
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Levy Amounts
Com
Ind
PP
Total
1,240,933
398,322
555,109
18,865,867
1,251,631
401,756
559,894
18,865,867
1,262,329
405,189
564,679
18,865,867
1,273,027
408,623
569,465
18,865,867
1,283,724
412,057
574,250
18,865,867
1,294,422
415,491
579,036
18,865,867
1,305,120
418,925
583,821
18,865,867
1,315,817
422,358
588,607
18,865,867
1,326,515
425,792
593,392
18,865,867
1,337,213
429,226
598,177
18,865,867
1,347,910
432,660
602,963
18,865,867
1,358,608
436,094
607,748
18,865,867
1,369,306
439,527
612,534
18,865,867
1,380,004
442,961
617,319
18,865,867
1,390,701
446,395
622,104
18,865,867
1,401,399
449,829
626,890
18,865,867
1,412,097
453,263
631,675
18,865,867
1,422,794
456,696
636,461
18,865,867
1,433,492
460,130
641,246
|18,865,867
1,444,190
463,564 646,032
18,865,867
1,454,887
466,998
650,817
18,865,867
1,465,585
470,432
655,602
18,865,867
1,476,283
473,866
660,388
18,865,867
1,486,981
477,299
665,173
18,865,867
1,497,678
480,733
669,959
18,865,867
1,508,376
484,167
674,744
18,865,867
1,519,074
487,601
679,529
18,865,867
1,529,771
491,035
|684,315
18,865,867
1,540,469
494,468
689,100
18,865,867
1,551,167
497,902
693,886
18,865,867
1,561,864
501,336
698,671
18,865,867
1,572,562
504,770
703,457
18,865,867
1,583,260
508,204
708,242
18,865,867
1,593,958
511,637
713,027
18,865,867
1,604,655
515,071
|717,813
18,865,867
Estimated Tax Rates
Res Os Com Ind
PP
16.53
19.52
|19.52
19.52
16.51
19.69
19.69
19.69
16.49
19.86
19.86
19.86
16.47
20.03
20.03
20.03
16.45
20.20
20.20
:20.20
16.44
20.36
20.36
20.36
16.42
20.53
20.53
20.53
16.40
20.70
20.70
20.70
16.38
20.87
20.87
20.87
16.36
16.34
16.32
16.30
16.29
16.27
16.25
16.23
16.21
16.19
16.17
16.15
16.14
16.12
16.10
16.08
16.06
21.04
21.04
21.04
21.21
21.21
21.21
21.37
21.37
21.37
21.54
21.54
21.54
21.71
21.71
21.71
21.88
21.88
21.88
22.05
22.05
22.05
22.22
22.22
22.22
22.38
22.38
22.38
22.55
22.55
22.55
22.72 22.72
22.72
22.89
22.89
22.89
23.06
23.06
23.06
23.23
23.23
23.23
23.39
23.39
23.39
23.56
23.56 23.56
23.73
23.73
23.73
16.04
16.02
16.00
15.99
15.97
15.95
15.93
15.91
15.89
23.90
23.90
23.90
24.07
24.07
24.07
24.24
24.24
24.24
24.40
24.40
24.40
24.57
24.57
(24.57
24.74
24.74 24.74
24.91
24.91
24.91
25.08
125.08
|25.08
25.24
25.24
25.24
===PAGE 7===
4.
7:30 p.m. Brent Benson, applicant for Cultural Council.
5. HB1972, election, primary
6. Update on Street Light issue
7. MPO Sub-Region Representative
8.
Review of Warrant Articles for Special Town Meeting
December 6, 2011
1. 7:30 p.m. Amory Phelps, applicant for Historical Commission [2 of 2 for 1
vacancy]
2.
Liquor License Renewals
December 13, 2011
1. 8:00 p.m. Joint Meeting w/ BOH to fill vacancy [Emond unavailable until after
7:30 p.m.]
2.
Joint Meeting w/ Housing Authority to fill vacancy
December 20, 2011
Pending Items:
1. Adoption of Statewide Mutual Aid Agreement
2. Update on Woodruff Farm
3. Application for 40S Funding
4. Review Plumbing, Gas, Electrical Permit Fee Schedule
5. Request to increase Ambulance Fees, continued
6. Mulpus Road/ Townsend Harbor Road intersection, survey report
7. BOS Policies & Procedures
8. Review Track & Field User Fee Proposal from Parks Commission
9. Personnel Metrics/ Performance Management/ Merit Pay discussion w/
Labor Counsel
10. Permanent Closure of Holman Street Bridge
11. Review discussion of Water IMA; water service in town
Town Meeting Warrant Articles:
1. New Revolving Fund-to collect Off Road Vehicle fines
===PAGE 8===
A district can recertity an FY2011 Statement of Interest it:
1. there are NO changes to the substance of the FY2011 SOI that was submitted by the
district;
2. there is NO change to the priority status of the FY2011 SOI that was submitted by the
district (i.c., if the 2011 SOI was the district's priority in 2011, it is still the district's
priority in 2012, and if the 2011 SOI was not the district's priority in 2011, it is still not
the district's priority in 2012);
3. there are NO changes to the conditions of the facility since the FY2011 SOI was
submitted to the MSBA;
4. there are NO changes to the closed school information that was submitted by the district
with the FY2011 SOI; AND
5. the District provided the required vote documentation to the satisfaction of the MSBA
with its FY2011 SOI submission.**
*The recertification option is not available for FY2011 Green Repair Program SOls or for SOls
that were filed prior to FY2011.
**If the MSBA receives a recertification request and the vote documentation submitted with its
FY2011 SOI was not satisfactory, the MSBA will notify the district.
To recertify an FY2011 SOI, the district should complete and submit the Statement of Interest
Recertification form below with the required signatures by November 30, 2011 to be considered
in FY2012. Please note, the District must complete and submit a separate Statement of Interest
Recertification Form for each FY2011 SOI it plans to recertify.
If the local votes were properly submitted in the format required by the MSBA with the initial
SOI submission in FY2011, the district will not need to take additional local votes.
The MSBA will not consider a recertified SOT without a properly completed and submitted
Statement of Interest Recertification Form, which shall have original signatures of the
required signatories.
***RECERTIFYING IS NOT AN OPTION FOR EVERY SOI***
If the District determines that there are any necessary changes that need to be made to the SOI
filed for consideration in FY2011, the District should not recertify the SOI. In this case, the
District should proceed with submitting a new SOI with updated information. If the District
submitted an SOI for consideration in FY2011 and would like to submit an SOI for the same
school for consideration in FY2012 with some changes, the MSBA can assist the District by pre-
populating an SOI with the FY2011 data. The District can then adjust the information to reflect
the current status of the school facility for which the SOI is being submitted.
If the District has any questions about how to proceed with filing an SOI for FY2012, please
contact Brian McLaughlin at 617-720-4466 or Brian.McLaughlin@massschoolbuildngs.org.
COPY
===PAGE 9===
Primary SOI Contact Name: Loxi Calmes
Primary SOI Contact Phone Number: 978-582-4100 X211
CERTIFICATIONS
The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his/her knowledge, information, and
belief, the statements and information contained in this Statement of Interest
Recertification and in the FY2011 Statement of Interest ("SOl") that was submitted to the
MSBA for consideration in FY2012 are true and accurate and that this Statement of
Interest Recertification and the FY2011
Statement of Interest have been prepared under the direction of the District school
committee and the undersigned are duly authorized to submit the Statement of Interest
Recertification to the Massachusetts School Building Authority (the "MSBA").
Further, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his/her knowledge,
information, and belief, the conditions at the school that is the subject of this Statement
of Interest Recertification and the FY2011 SOI have not changed since the FY2011 SOI
was submitted for consideration by the MSBA. The undersigned hereby further certifies
and that the information provided to the MSBA in the FY2011 SOI is still a true and
accurate statement of the problems at the school facility that is the subject of this
Statement of Interest Recertification.
Further, the undersigned hereby certifies that there is no change to the status of the
District's selected priority Statement of Interest for FY2011 and that the same Statement
of Interest that the district selected as its priority for consideration in FY2011 is still the
District's priority.
Further, the undersigned hereby certifies that there is no change to the closed school
information that was submitted by the district with the FY2011 SOI.
Further, the undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his/her knowledge,
information, and belief, the District provided the proper vote documentation, in the format
prescribed by the MSBA, to the MSBA for its FY2011 SOI submission. The District
hereby acknowledges and agrees that, if the District failed to provide the required vote
documentation with its FY2011 SOI submission, this Statement of Interest Recertification
submission will not be considered complete.
STATEMENT OF INTEREST RECERTIFICATION FORM, PAGE 1
===PAGE 10===
Further, the undersigned hereby acknowledges and agrees to provide, upon request by the MSBA,
any additional information relating to this Statement of Interest Recertification and the District's
FY2011 SOI that may be requested or required by the MSBA.
Further, the undersigned hereby acknowledges and agrees that the District will abide by all federal
and state laws and all rules, regulations, policies, and guidelines of the MSBA and that the District
has no entitlement to funds and that the awarding of a grant, if any, is at the sole discretion of the
LOCAL CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(E.g., Mayor, Town Manager,
Board of Selectmen)
DISTRICT
SUPERINTENDENT
SCHOOL
COMMITTEE CHAIR
(print name)
(signature)
(date)
Loxito Calmes David Reif
(print name)
(print name)
(signature)
Davit Reil
(signature)
11/9/11
(date)
(date)
* The MSBA will not consider a recertified SOI without a properly completed and
submitted Statement of Interest Recertification which shall (1) provide the names of the
required signatories, (2) have the original signatures of the required signatories, and (3)
shall be dated by the required signatories. The recertified SOI must also meet all of the
MSBA's requirements to be considered by the MSBA.
STATEMENT OF INTEREST RECERTIFICATION FORM, PAGE 2