===OCR macOS Vision===
===PAGE 1===
8 MAJA 10.
IM2
RECEIVED & FILED
BOARD OF SELECTMEN
AUG 1 2 2015
MEETING MINUTES
July 21,2015
LUNENBURG TOWN
CLERK OFFICE
The Board of Selectmen met in the Joseph F. Bilotta Meeting Room, Town Hall, as scheduled with Jamie
Toale, Chair; Robert Ebersole, Vice Chair; Thomas Alonzo, Clerk; Paula Bertram, Member; Phyllis Luck,
Member and Town Manager Kerry Lafleur (formerly Speidel). The meeting opened at 7:00 PM with the Pledge
of Allegiance.
Public Comment:
Mr. Alonzo announced the Library-sponsored "Great Cardboard Boat Race" at the Town Beach on Lake
Whalom on August 8" at 5:00 p.m. Rain date is Monday, August 10th
. He also commended the Turkey Hill
Gardeners for the beautiful plantings in the Town Center and to Lakeview Nurseries who provide assistance as
well. Ms. Luck announced there is a new shipment of compost bins available; they are $43.00 and can be
purchased at the Public Works.
Sam Ramondelli of Reservoir Road stated he saw the Highway Department coming down the road clearing both
sides of the road. He rushed out with a cold drink for the driver as it was a hot day. He wanted to thank them for
the work they do. He called the DPW and spoke with Mr. Rodriquenz as well. They all do a tremendous job.
Karim and Rachel Gabriel of 60 Burrage Street presented about their beagle, Edge, who ran away on March
Mr. Gabriel stated the Police Department has been very helpful as well as other small businesses; they
have called about two other beagles that they have found wandering. Edge has not been seen since March 19th
although they have followed up on leads. On Saturday the Gabriels spoke to a woman who had found a beagle
and had called the Animal Control Officer. The woman who called had been advised by the ACO to let the dog
go, that it would probably go home on its own. Social media has been helpful in the search and there a lot of
comments posted regarding the lost dog, mostly positive. The Gabriels asked that an investigation be conducted
on the allegations made on social media regarding the ACO and to make the report public. They also asked the
Board to increase Lunenburg's social media footprint related to the ACO. Finally, they asked the Board to
reconsider a "Leash Law." Edge is micro-chipped and if he had been picked up he might have been found.
Mr. Ebersole stated that the Lunenburg bylaw is not a leash law but rather a restraint law. It is illegal for dogs to
run on other people's property and is technically a public nuisance. Mr. Toale thanked Mr. Gabriel and stated as
a dog owner he did empathize with them.
Debra Leger of Sandy Cove Road stated she was the woman who found the beagle and it was on last Thursday.
She contacted the ACO to find out what to do. She added this has turned into a witch hunt for the ACO; Ms.
Comeau is a good person, has been in office since 1977 and works on a small budget on a supposedly part-time
basis. Ms. Leger stated Ms. Comeau actually works 24/7 and only gets $3 per day to care for dogs. She has
never gotten a raise. Someone who only gets $3 per day to care for a dog is not in it for the money. She comes
out when needed. Ms. Leger stated the dog was not run down and appeared in good health. She empathizes with
Mr. and Mrs. Gabriel, but the beagle found actually lives on Sandy Cove Road. Ms. Comeau does not have
unlimited resources to care for every dog running loose and this needs to be considered.
Kim Martin, 522 Burrage Street, has contacted the ACO three times. Ms. Martin stated a dog showed up at her
house and ACO told her there is no leash law in town, and to let the dog go. Her husband found another dog
weaving in and out of traffic another time. The ACO told her again to let the dog go. The Martins canvassed the
neighborhood where they found the dog for three days in a row and tried to find the owner. They finally did.
They had called the ACO and she told them there were no lost dogs reported. Another time Ms. Martin
===PAGE 2===
contacted the ACO regarding a sick looking raccoon walking around. She told her she didn't handle raccoons.
Ms. Martin asked her what she should do; ACO told her to call Police, but they wouldn't do anything about it
either. She was extremely rude and all she could tell me was I was out of luck. Isn't there some sort of resource
for dealing with a wild animal? She echoed the social media request as well.
Troy Daniels, 98 Main Street, stated he found a poodle and was told by the ACO to let the dog loose. He took
the dog in and kept it safe until he could locate the owners. This is an old problem. He stated a solution is
needed. Mr. Toale thanked everyone for their input. He added the Board would take all accounts given this
evening into consideration. The ACO is an employee of the town and under the Town Manager's purview.
Mr. Alonzo requested a full description of the responsibilities of the Animal Control Officer for a future
meeting. Ms. Leger returned to the podium stating wild animals do not fall under the umbrella of wildlife
management. Wildlite management does not answer wild animal calls half of the time. Mr. Toale stated they
would review the ACO job duties. Ms. Leger advocated for a leash law where people would have to come pick
up their pet and then pay a fine to get them back. That would generate more money for the town.
Mr. Daniels returned to the podium and stated that is not the case and that for the record Ms. Comeau is also the
Animal Inspector and has been derelict in those duties as well. Mr. Alonzo stated in the ten and a half years that
he has been on the Board and believes if someone feels they are a part-time employee, and they feel they are not
being given the tools or mechanisms to do their job correctly, they should take it upon themselves to come and
request them. Ms. Comeau has never come in and asked for more funding or facilities.
George Martin, 522 Burrage Street, stated he was bad; he had two unlicensed dogs he kept inside and had just
paid $300 in delinquent dog license fees. He wondered if other people are also paying those late fees, shouldn't
the money go directly to her? He asked if there are logs being maintained to see the ACO work load.
Ms. Lafleur stated the issue of the ACO vehicle has also been raised several times. The town does not own it;
there is no town seal on it. The ACO purchased the vehicle for her personal use and she also uses it while
performing her ACO duties for the town.
Chiet Marino stated he believed Ms. Comeau paid $300 for the vehicle years and he put a light bar on the roof
for safety reasons. He reported that he has had an officer investigating this case for three days. He stated he has
a great appreciation for the passion people have for animals, but the Facebook comments got carried away. The
beagle belongs to someone on South Cove Road and the owner said the dog continually escapes by digging
under the fence. Last time the beagle escaped the collar slipped off while going under the fence. This was not
the dog that disappeared from Burrage Street.
Ms. Lafleur stated typically the town would not release logs from an investigation but we would report on
statistics that would appear in the annual town report. One did not appear in the past year but Ms. Lafleur did
make a note that an annual report would appear going forward.
Mr. Daniels asked if it was perfectly okay for the ACO to tell someone to set a dog free. We have the highest
rate of rabies in the state so these animals pose a threat to the community - is that we are saying - it's okay to
let the dog loose?
Ms. Bertram stated being a two dog owner she empathizes with people looking for their dog, as she has lost a
dog before. She appreciates all the comments on both sides. An issue has been brought to the Board that needs
further investigation and she hoped it will appear on a future agenda and that they could hear from the ACO
about any issues she has in operating her department and concerns of residents. Mr. Toale stated it would.
Greg Bittner, 129 Pleasant Street, stated he knows the Board is the appointing authority and asked if the
residents have some avenue other than this Board to lodge a formal complaint. Mr. Toale stated if there is a
complaint it should be made to the Town Manager. Ms. Lafleur stated she will accept the comments here as a
formal complaint.
===PAGE 3===
Pole Petition Hearing for Oak Avenue
Mr. Toale opened the public hearing. The petition was from Verizon New England to place one solely owned
pole numbered T.10 1/2 on the southeasterly side of Oak Avenue at a point approximately three hundred and
eighty-eight feet northeasterly from the center line of Turkey Hill Road.
Kelly Correa of Verizon reported they would be placing a new service pole for phone lines to the new school.
Mr. Ebersole asked why the lines did not go underground as with the other utilities. Ms. Corriea stated it was to
avoid digging up the road pavement and she assumed it was because the other utility pole in that area has
reached its equipment-holding capacity. The pole is to get the service line across the street at which point it will
go underground to the phone room in the new school.
Mr. Toale asked if there was any further comment from those present. Having heard no further comments, Mr.
Toale closed the hearing.
Motion: P. Bertram
To approve the pole petition as requested
2°d:B. Ebersole
Vote: All in Favor
Class II Auto Dealer License Application for Adnan Inayat at 10 Massachusetts Avenue
Mr. Toale read the hearing notice aloud: the Licensing Authority will hold a public hearing on July 21, 2015 at
7:30 p.m. at Town Hall, 17 Main Street, 2'' Floor, Lunenburg, on the application submitted by Adnan Inayat
d/b/a Premium Motors for a Class II Auto Dealer License. The license is to be exercised at premises located at
10 Massachusetts Avenue. Mr. Inayat stated he has moved here from Atlanta, Georgia where he sold used cars
for ten years. He would like to do that in Lunenburg. He has obtained a special permit from the ZBA. He has
also appeared before the Planning Board whose hearing has been continued to July 27" due to abutters'
concerns regarding parking and location of vehicles. Mr. Inayat obtained a letter with the landlord and three
tenants signing off after he met with them. He also has a parking plan which indicates where the cars will be
located and the designated parking for tenants and customers as well. Discussion ensued regarding whether to
continue the hearing or make the license contingent on the Planning Board development plan approval.
Motion: B. Ebersole
2n°: P. Bertram
To continue the hearing to August 4* at 7:30 p.m.
Vote: All in Favor
Mr. Inayat thanked the Board for their time.
Current Business:
Notice of First Refusal for 150 & 164 White Street
Alan Foster, 164 White Street, presented concerning the above property. He stated he had purchased 75 acres
initially and 65 are in Chapter 61A. His home is on a parcel of land outside of the chapter land and he would
like to discontinue 11.13 of the chapter acres to be merged with his home. He would like to sell a total parcel
including his home consisting of 14.25 acres, of combined chapter and non-chapter land. Ms. Bertram requested
clarity due to the letter from Mr. Foster's attorney regarding an exemption from the statute regarding use of the
chapter land for a residence of the owner not being a conversion. She stated the residence already existed and is
questioning it because the Conservation Commission has expressed interest in the property. Mr. Foster reported
it was the State Forester who pointed out that this was the correct process to handle the request for separating
the 11.13 acres. He added he is prepared to pay the rollback tax if the Board will waive the Right of First
Refusal (ROFR). Mr. Foster stated he was informed the Conservation Commission had notified the Board of
Selectmen office that they were not interested as of this morning. He added the property he is selling has a dam
located on it that contains a 9 acre pond that must be maintained, especially during rain events. Clearly the
person who purchases and lives in the home is the person who should maintain the dam. He would like to be
able to move forward merging these two properties so it can be best maintained by someone who is on site.
Ms. Lafleur reported the Town received the ROFR request in June and sent it to legal counsel to ensure it met
all the legal requirements; there were some deficiencies and asked for a new letter from Mr. Foster. We
requested feedback from Planning Board, Open Space and Conservation Commission by July 17"h
. We have
heard back in writing from Planning Board and Open Space that they are not interested in the town exercising
its right. What Ms. Lafleur was told was that Conservation Commission had made no recommendation. Ms.
Bertram stated she was informed by Chair Bursch to convey its interest at this meeting. Ms. Lafleur stated the
===PAGE 4===
office requested at least twice that Conservation Commission put its recommendation or lack of
recommendation in writing. Ms. Bertram stated otherwise and that Conservation did not have enough
information to make a decision. Ms. Bertram also questioned whether the exemption would still apply if Mr.
Foster intends to sell the property. Ms. Lafleur stated the second letter of intent was only received yesterday so
she does not have an opinion from town counsel and can't answer Ms. Bertram's question regarding the
exemption. She added she was very clear in writing with all three boards asking for an opinion by July 17° and
asking them to let her know if they needed more time. It would have been helpful if we received a response
because we are not looking to rush people through the process.
Further discussion ensued regarding legality of the second letter of notice and the owner's attorney's
interpretation of the exemption of the statute. Ms. Bertram noted the Conservation Commission did not have the
sale price and the new letter before the 17'h
". They meet again on Wednesday, August 5". Mr. Toale pointed out
if the letter does meet the requirements of the ROFR, then the clock has started on the 120 day period of the
first refusal option. Mr. Ebersole noted since the Board appoints the Conservation Commission, the Board as
the appointing authority need to communicate strongly that they didn't follow through on the Town Manager's
request. This is our duty as supervisors.
Motion: B. Ebersole
2"d P. Bertram
To request Conservation Commission provide information and have Town Counsel review the second
letter and clarify the exemption statute
Vote: All in Favor
The Board will revisit again at their meeting on August 11*.
1) Interim Loan Instructions & Financial Agreement Instructions [ED-01.FID866556]
Ms. Lafleur referred the Board to the Interim Loan Note related to the Sewer Commission's extension
project for the Pratt Street area; an interim loan agreement with the Massachusetts Clean Water Trust in
the amount of $1,521,653. The interest rate is. 9 of 1%. When this is permanently financed we expect
the final interest rate will be 2%. This involves a lengthy vote that shall be read by the Clerk of the
Board. Mr. Alonzo read the Vote of the Board of Selectmen aloud into the record.
Motion: T. Alonzo
I, the Clerk of the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Lunenburg, MA, certify that at a meeting
held July 21, 2015, of which meeting all members of the board were duly notified and at which a
quorum was present, the following vote was passed, all of which appears upon the official record
of the board in my custody:
VOTED:
1) That the Town shall issue a bond or bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$1,521,653 (the "Bonds") pursuant to C.29C and 44 of General Laws and votes of the Town passed
May 3, 2014 (Article 25), which authorized a total borrowing of $2,200,000, for the construction of
sewers and other water pollution control facilities identified in such votes (the "Project");
2) that in anticipation of the issuance of the Bonds the Treasurer is authorized to issue an interim
loan note or notes (the "Notes") from time to time in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$1,521,653;
3) that each Bond or Note shall be issued as a single registered security, and sold to the
Massachusetts Clean Water Trust (the "Trust") at a price determined pursuant to the Financing
Agreement;
4) that the Treasurer is authorized to determine the date, the form, the maximum interest rate and
the principal maturities of each Bond and Note, and to execute a Financing Agreement (or
Agreements) with the Trust with respect to the sale of the Bonds and Notes, such date, form and
maturities and the specific interest rate or rates of the Bonds and Notes to be approved by a
majority of the Board of Selectmen and the Treasurer and evidenced by their execution of the
Bonds or Notes;
5) that all action taken to date by the Town and its officers and agents to carry out the Project and
its financing, including the execution of any loan commitment or agreement by the Treasurer, are
hereby ratified, approved and confirmed and;
6) that the Treasurer and the other appropriate Town officials are each hereby authorized to take
any and all actions necessary or convenient to carry out the provisions of this vote, including
===PAGE 5===
execution and delivery of the Financing Agreements) and the Project Regulatory Agreements)
relating to the Project.
I further certify that the vote was adopted at a meeting open to the public, that no vote was taken
by secret ballot, that notice stating the place, date, time and agenda of the meeting (which agenda
included the adoption of the above vote) was filed with the Town Clerk and a copy thereof posted
in a manner conspicuously visible to the public at all hours in or on the municipal building that
the office of the Town Clerk is located or, if applicable, in accordance with an alternative method
of notice prescribed or approved by the Attorney General as set forth in 940 CMR 29.03(2) (b), at
least 48 hours, not including Saturdays, Sundays or legal holidays, prior to the time of the meeting
and remained so posted at the time of the meeting, that no deliberations or decisions in connection
with the sale of the Bonds or Notes were taken in executive session, and that the official record of
the meeting was made available to the public promptly and remains available to the public, all in
accordance with G. L. c.30A, §818-25, as amended. I further certify that the vote has not been
amended, supplemented or revoked and remains in effect on this date. Dated July 21, 2015
2'': B. Ebersole
Vote: All in Favor
The Board signed the certificate and Clerk Alonzo signed the vote.
2) Unitil Rate Case and Grid Modernization
Ms. Lafleur recapped that the Board had provided some questions to her to ask Unitil regarding grid
modernization, time of use rates, and associated costs at last week's meeting. She also had legal counsel
working on the Town filing as an intervener in the rate case. Ms. Lafleur reported today, July 21, the
Town as well as Town Counsel received the formal notice of the filing of the rate case dated June 29,
2015 with a deadline of July 13, 2015 to file a Petition to Intervene. Unitil sent the notice after the filing
deadline. Town Counsel will raise this issue with the Department of Public Utilities. Town Counsel
believes our petition will be granted even though it is filed late.
Ms. Lafleur stated there were questions from the Board regarding the grid modernization case. One
question was whether any of the proposed enhancements would be done on a cost neutral basis; this is
up to DPU to determine as part of the process. It appears Unitil would be looking to recoup whatever
costs associated with the modernization probably through a separate process. Another question asked if
there would be an incentive for using electricity at "off peak" hours. This is something DPU has asked
Unitil to look at as part of this program. No formal decisions have been made so far.
Mr. Toale asked if the two issues would be part of the hearing and would the Board acting as interveners
have an opportunity to be heard on them. Ms. Lafleur stated these are two separate cases, so she
wouldn't expect the above two questions to be addressed during the rate case. Unitil did ask for
comments on the grid modernization by the end of this month so we can incorporate these items in that.
Mr. Alonzo pointed out the rate case hearing is scheduled for August 12 in Fitchburg, which is the same
night the Kinder Morgan gas pipeline meeting is scheduled. Ms. Lafleur offered to draft comments for
the grid modernization reflective of the discussion and points made tonight.
Motion: P. Bertram
2"°: R. Ebersole
To authorize Chairman Toale to sign a letter on behalf of the Board
Vote: All in Favor
3) Fiscal Year 2016 Goals
Mr. Toale reported the Board had held a workshop and arrived at three goals with the assigned Board
members heading the topic for the upcoming year;
1) Storm Water Management Plan (Ms. Luck and Ms. Bertram) Ms. Bertram reported this is a
multifaceted issue. Three primary areas that need to be addressed are 1) storm water regulations, 2)
existing infrastructure, maintenance and management requirements, associated cost and capital
needs, and 3) regulations for MS4 - Existing and proposed NDES Storm water permit compliance
requirements and plan to meet those requirements. She also suggested a storm water utility be
developed, a system to bill property owners, a strong public education program, and creation of a
bylaw to establish the utility. Mr. Ebersole suggested the Water District become a member of the
===PAGE 6===
proposed subcommittee that was suggested to work on various aspects of storm water management.
Another suggestion made was on septic system maintenance program as a way to avoid extra
nitrogen from being discharged.
Mr. Toale asked are these the three big goals that we as the Board want to tackle and be measured on
either this fiscal year or long-term. Also, do we need other committees to participate and how much
time do we want to spend on this in terms of staff work time or as workshops?
2) Pavement Management Plan/Traffic Rules & Orders (Mr. Ebersole)
Mr. Ebersole reported we are still waiting for Town Counsel to provide final opinion on traffic rules
and orders. He has spoken with Police Chief Marino as well on these. He stated a need to explore
revenue sources and make projections for the future considering Chapter 90, town funds and
borrowing, consider betterments for certain roads in town, document qualified federal roads, and
improve the pavement management software and index. We need to ensure that residents can see
what roads are going to be worked on, look at drainage, whether it's storm water or not, do an
analysis on historical spending versus road miles, and adopt official maintenance and utility road
opening policies.
3) Economic Development (Mr. Toale and Mr. Alonzo)
Mr. Toale reported this is one component of the Town's overall long-term strategy. Economic
development is in competition with Land Use, Transportation, Natural Resources, Open Space,
Recreation, Housing, Community Services and Facilities. All Lunenburg residents, business owners,
and employees hold a stake in the Town's economic success. The following groups play a major
role in setting the economic development agenda and driving activities and deliverables to achieve
goals: Planning Board, Selectmen, Finance Committee, Conservation Commission, Historical
Commission, Building Reuse, Capital Planning as well as Sewer Commission, Land Use, DPW, and
Police and Fire Departments.
The hardest thing is to determine what it is the town wants to be and to fit this component in with
the other competing components. Information needs to be gathered via Town Meeting, surveys,
town website, public access channel, hearings and committee work. The Board would fine tune
the plan. Mr. Toale presented possible measurement metrics to track success or progress. They were
percentage of taxes paid, amount of undeveloped land zoned for business, employment rates, wealth
per capita and median incomes, housing cost burden, where residents work, travel times to work, the
number of jobs and employers in town and full-time versus part-time jobs.
It is recommended that the Board of Selectman set an achievable goal for FY16 that would define
activities during the fiscal year leading to the creation of an Economic Development Plan.
Mr. Toale reported some other items discussed were short term goals and Town Manager's goals.
Town Manager goals are vehicle inventory, department metrics, personnel evaluations, project status
worksheet/ outstanding items and requests, and creating job descriptions for all elected officials and
appointed board and committee members. Mr. Toale suggested setting another workshop date in
order to go to the next step in more detail. The date of August 25 at 6:00 PM for a workshop was
suggested. The goal for this workshop will be to define short term deliverables.
4) Minutes of April 14 and July 7, 2015 were approved. An Accounts Payable warrant in the amount
of $1,729,817.65 was presented for signatures.
Action File Issue
Mr. Alonzo reported the state is looking to expand the public records law; imposing new administrative
burdens, timelines and significant unfunded mandates on cities and towns. The bill would significantly reduce
the amount that communities can charge for complying with a public records request and expanding municipal
responsibilities. Communities would only have 15 days to comply on every public records request. Mr. Alonzo
suggested small towns should lobby against this. He added the Legislature continues to exempt itself from all
===PAGE 7===
aspects of the public records law. This expansion would have a very negative impact on the Town. Ms. Bertram
agreed and suggested the Board send a letter to our legislators voicing our concerns on this proposed legislation.
Mr. Toale concurred
6) Mass DOT Title VI/Non-discrimination Assurance Requirement
Ms. Lafleur reported MassDOT is requesting review and signature on the Federal Highway Administration Title
VI non-discrimination assurance. This asserts the community's commitment to not discriminate in any program,
service or activity supported by federal financial assistance. The assurance should be signed by the Chair.
Motion: T. Alonzo
2"d: P. Bertram
To authorize the Chair to sign the Title VI/Non-discrimination Assurance
Vote: All in Favor
7) Committee Reports:
Board of Health -continues to address failed septic system and systems that require upgrading in addition to
regular business; Building Reuse Committee- the RFQ for Building Needs Study is still out and we are waiting
for responses; Cable Advisory Committee-discussed the resident cable survey format, PACC business plan
and departmental, facility, and service needs for cable access: Capital Planning Committee- no report;
Conservation Commission-held several hearings, Lake Shirley Improvement Corp. will need to file a new NOI
for drawdown and herbicide and algaecide treatment with the Conservation Commission. The hearing is August
5". Finance Committee-Mr. Alonzo reported the Finance Committee Appointing Committee appointed
Mark Erickson and Terese Burchfield to the Finance Committee earlier this evening; there is still a vacancy on
the Finance Committee; Library Board of Trustees- no report; MART Advisory- no report; MPO- meeting
rescheduled to the 30"h
, Ms. Luck will be attending; the Summer Street project informational meeting is
tomorrow night; Planning Board-no report; PACC- no report; School Committee-no report; School Building
Committee- met today to sign warrants and a change order totaling $37,000; Sewer Commission-met on the
14'"' and is continuing work on grease trap compliance and infiltration inflow prevention; the Pratt Street sewer
project has begun; ZBA-meeting tomorrow upon the petition for a special permit for 59 Easter Brook Road for
a dimensional variation to create a new lot with reduced frontage in order to build a home.
Town Manager/Department Reports- Ms. Lafleur reported on the final Fiscal Year 2015 expenditure report.
There are also five transfer requests for expenditures totaling $14,442.62 as allowed under M.G.L. Chapter 44,
§33B, that will be brought to this Board after Finance Committee review. She stated we are closing the fiscal
year having expended $31.6 million with a surplus of just under $87,000. We have $241,544.08 encumbered
due to contracts in process at the end of the fiscal year, almost all between school and public works
departments.
Appointment of Election Officers: Ms. Lafleur noted the legal opinion provided on conflict of interest law as
appied when two part-time employees also serve as election officials. Any employee serving as an election
officer would need to file disclosure of interest with the Town Clerk office. Mr. Ebersole noted in the disclosure
trom one employee, she states that her services will be provided outside her normal working hours as a
municipal employee. He asked since state elections occur on Tuesdays, could we get clarification on whether
vacation or personal time counts as outside hours. This item and the election officers' appointments will be
placed on the next meeting agenda after the question is answered.
Appointment
Brian Leblanc has applied to be reappointed as Assistant Radio Operator.
Motion: B. Ebersole
To appoint Brian LeBlanc as Assistant Radio Operator
Public Comment: none
Motion: P. Bertram
To adjourn the meeting at 7:17 p.m.
2nd: T. Alonzo
Vote: All in Favor
2nd: B. Ebersole
Vote: All in Favor
RECEIVED & FILED
Respectfully submitted,
Claire In. Peterson
Elaine M. Peterson, Executive Assistant to the Town Manager
AUG 12 2015
LUNENBURG TOWN
CLERK OFFICE