Lunenburg Budget Project · Data architecture · high level
Follow the money
Every route into Lunenburg’s school budget and out the other side, level by level — and the level at which each trail goes cold.
The answer, FY2026
Town Meeting appropriation — dept 300 School Department
budget
$26,323,868
Town Meeting appropriation — dept 301 non-recurring
budget
$35,777
Appropriated — 51.2% of the town’s whole omnibus
budget
$26,359,645
The school’s own Funds — money in
actual
$1,553,151
The school’s own Funds — money out
actual
$1,736,376
…and held in those Funds at Q3
actual
$1,592,572
Everything the schools spent in FY2026
mixed basis
$28,096,021
That last row adds a budget to an actual, and this project’s first rule forbids it. The appropriation is what was authorised; the Fund figure is what was spent. They are on different bases and there is no document that puts them on the same one — which is the honest form of the answer, not a caveat on it. Read it as “about $28.1M passed through the schools,” never as a figure to compute a rate from.
Everything that comes in, and who draws it out
Sources on the left, grouped in the middle, and the pot they all land in. From that pot sixty-seven departments draw, and the school is one of them — it takes 50.5%. Nothing ties a source to a department, so the green figures beside each source are a distribution: what that source would contribute if the school’s share were drawn evenly from all of them.
One pot, sixty-seven draws, and an estimated split. Sources are FY2026 budgeted revenue; departments the revised budget at period 9; the school’s own Funds actual spending at Q3. The distribution uses 50.483% — the appropriation as a share of all revenue — so the estimated parts sum exactly to $26,359,645.
Why a distribution rather than a figure. The town raises $52,215,332 and spends it across 67 departments, and no accounting entry assigns a revenue source to a department — the school sits inside Article 10, the omnibus, which the town raises and appropriates as one sum. So the funding source is recorded per article, never per department, and the school is not its own article.
The exception proves it: the FY2027 override was voted as its own article and split explicitly — $1,600,000 to the School Department and $757,651.68 to town departments at Tier 1. That money is attributable, because the town chose to vote it separately.
And the even split is probably wrong. Chapter 70 is education aid measured against a minimum the Commonwealth requires the town to spend on its schools, so its real share is likely higher than 50.5% — while excluded debt is raised for named debt and is not general at all. Getting past the estimate needs the Town Accountant’s year-end statements, which is why the annual town reports are being ingested.
How much of it is education money
The diagram above cannot answer this, and the reason is the finding rather than a flaw in the drawing: Chapter 70 has no arrow to the school budget because there is no such arrow. It enters the town’s single pot and stops being that money. But the question is a fair one and it does have an answer — just a different kind of answer, so it gets a different kind of mark.
Two different questions, two different marks. Solid boxes are money that can be followed. The dashed box is money that is education money by origin and untraceable by path — computed by DESE from this district’s own foundation budget, then paid to the town, where it becomes indistinguishable from a property tax dollar.
Why this is worth being careful about. Massachusetts sets a minimum the town must spend on its schools, and Chapter 70 is calculated from the district’s foundation budget — so the aid is education money in every sense except the one that would let you trace it. Above that minimum the allocation is the town’s to make, and nothing in the archive establishes what Lunenburg’s requirement is or where it sits against the $26.4M. That is a document we do not have, not a calculation we have not done.
Follow one dollar, six levels down
Four dollars enter the school budget by four different doors. Each passes through the same six levels, and each stops being followable at a different one. The level where a trail ends is the whole finding of this project — every standing question is a question about a level below the one we can reach.
Four dollars, six levels, two places the trail ends. A tax dollar and a Chapter 70 dollar stop being distinguishable at level 3 — the general fund is one pot, and no report un-mixes it. Grant and fee dollars stay separable all the way down and then stop at level 6, where the only document that would carry them has been provided once, for athletics.
Which is why the questions are the questions
Every standing question this project has is a request to see one level lower than the archive reaches. Did a grant pay for those paraprofessionals? is level 6 on the grant column. What did Chapter 70 buy? is level 3 on a trail that ended two levels up. Were the budgeted positions filled? is a level below 6 that nothing records at all.
Two routes in. Route 1 is a budget figure at FY2026 period 9; Route 2 is actual spending at FY2026 Q3. The general fund box is the town’s revenue, not the school’s — the school’s share of it is decided by the vote, not by which tax paid for what.
Every Fund the school has, and what moved through it
Twenty-one of the sixty-one had FY2026 activity. A Fund keeps its balance year to year, which is why several spent money without taking any in — and why four end the period negative, awaiting a reimbursement that has not landed.
Fund
Name
What feeds it
In
Out
Balance
2200
School lunch revolving
Meal payments
$572,231
$739,586
$287,771
2640
Special ed circuit breaker
State reimbursement
$325,970
$4,005
$615,301
1312
Extended day revolving
Fees from families
$192,943
$233,350
$54,161
1301
Chapter 658 — athletics
Athletic fees, gate
$160,164
$100,467
$169,945
1305
After school activities
Fees from families
$111,376
$95,196
$148,578
1308
School choice revolving
Tuition in from other towns
$83,116
$30,558
$299,461
2672
FY26 Family & Community 237
State grant
$48,558
$13,372
$35,186
1311
School gift fund
Donations
$22,486
$2,911
$109,398
1306
School facilities use
Hall and field hire
$18,670
$12,354
$71,559
2681
Comprehensive school health
Grant
$10,775
$5,120
$5,655
1302
Adult education revolving
Course fees
$4,000
$2,880
$12,744
1300
Lost books / technology
Charges
$2,860
$661
$16,665
2813
FY25 #240 special education
Federal grant
$0
$229,398
−$88,503
2814
FY26 #240 special education
Federal grant
$0
$179,637
−$179,637
2778
FY25 Student Opportunity Act
State grant
$0
$68,647
−$91,220
2832
FY25 #274
Grant
$0
$5,427
$0
2690
FY26 #309 Title IV part A
Federal grant
$0
$3,240
−$3,240
2728
FY24 Title II part A #140
Federal grant
$0
$3,217
$5,108
2622
FY25 Family & Community
State grant
$0
$2,477
$70,800
2800
FY25 #140
Grant
$0
$2,208
$0
2758
FY23 #240
Federal grant
$0
$1,666
−$8,167
All 61 Funds
40 of them dormant in FY2026
$1,553,151
$1,736,376
$1,592,572
Two things worth stopping on. Fund 2640 took in $325,970 of circuit breaker reimbursement and spent $4,005 of it, sitting on $615,301 — the state’s share of high-cost special education places, banked rather than spent in-year. And four grant Funds close the period negative, which is what a grant looks like when the district spends first and is reimbursed after.
And the rest of the town
The same vote that gives the school $26.4M gives every other department its money at the same moment, in one article. This is what the omnibus splits into.
One article, 67 departments. A resident voting the omnibus votes all of this at once. Figures are the revised budget at FY2026 period 9.
Other departments have Route 2 money too — and we cannot see it
The enterprise funds are visible because they appear in the same ledger report:
Fund
Name
Revenue
Expense
6000
Sewer enterprise
$1,454,671
$1,726,394
7900
Solid waste / recycling enterprise
$1,000,000
—
5000
Sewer betterments
$436,667
$184,920
6200
PEG access enterprise
$225,927
$225,928
6100 · 5100
Water enterprise, water betterments
$0
$0
But the 61-Fund report we hold is school Funds only. Other departments will have revolving and gift Funds of their own — the library, the council on aging, recreation, cemetery and inspectional services all typically do — and none of them is in anything we have. So the picture above is complete for the schools and demonstrably incomplete for everybody else, and this page says so rather than drawing a tidy diagram over the gap.