lunenburgbudgetproject.org — written by the Lunenburg Budget Project, an independent tool for residents. Not affiliated with the Town of Lunenburg, the School Committee or the school district. The data this page is computed from: /data/boards.json
From the town’s minutes (23 of 23 sets read) and our minutes of the recordings (0), joined per meeting: 7 substantive, 29 procedural (accepting minutes, adjourning). Where both records have a vote the town’s wording stands; none disagree on the outcome.
date
motion
outcome
record
check it
Nov 24 2015
To recommend option 4 for the municipal reuse study — moved by R. Albert“the motion was made to recommend option 4. (r. albert) 2n° (m. mackin) all in favor.”
Recommend moving forward with Tappe Associates — moved by Dave MacDonald“dave macdonald made a motion to recommend moving forward with tappe associates. mark erickson second. all in favor.”
Committee recommend approval of both Article 26 and Article 27, each heard separately — moved by Dave MacDonald“dave macdonald made a motion that the committee recommend approval of both article 26 and article 27 and that each article should be heard separately. second, mark erickson. 6 in favor, 1 nay.”
Use the Passios property site study as a conversation point in discussion with the school committee — moved by Ron Albert“ron albert made a motion to use that site study as a conversation point in the discussion with the school committee. second, dave macdonald, all in favor.”
Recommend the BOS add the old primary school to the committee charter — moved by Dave MacDonald“dave macdonald made a motion (deb seeley 21°) to recommend the bos add the old primary school to the committee charter. committee votes 7-0 in favor.”
Nominate Dave Matthews as a new member as citizen at large — moved by Dave MacDonald“dave macdonald made a motion (damon mcquaid 2"d) to nominate dave matthews as a new member as citizen at large. committee votes 7-0 in favor.”
The town’s minutes are the record: a vote from them carries the minutes’ own words, checked verbatim. A vote from the recording only was written by a language model from machine captions — a motion as heard, and “not audible” a finding about the recording — and links to the second in the video.