An analysis, written by this project
Budgets across town
What Town Meeting voted for each of the twelve town departments, and which of them actually move the total. It refuses the question it is most often asked — an omnibus budget cannot show a deficit, because a town may not vote one — and answers the useful version: ten of twelve departments grew faster than the levy cap, and the biggest line is not the fastest.
lunenburgbudgetproject.org — written by the Lunenburg Budget Project, an independent tool for residents. Not affiliated with the Town of Lunenburg, the School Committee or the school district. The document this page renders: /docs/analyses/town-budgets.md
- Schools$25.1M
- Protection of persons & property$4.6M
- Employee benefits & reserves$4.3M
- Maturing Debt & Interest$2.9M
- Public Works$2.2M
- General Government$2.2M
- Facilities & Grounds$1.0M
- Library$584k
- Solid Waste & Recycling$470k
- Assistance$341k
- Health & Sanitation$118k
- Central Purchasing$80k
What this report counts
DOLLARS VOTED at Town Meeting, in the omnibus budget for the year ahead. Not what any department requested, not what it spent, and not a service level. A voted budget is already balanced, so it records who absorbed the pressure rather than who is short.
More than half the town budget is the schools, and four departments are five sixths of it
Most of what the town votes on is one department, and most of the rest is three.
Before any question about growth: this is how one voted budget divides between the twelve departments that share it. Schools takes 57.1% of the FY2025 voted budget. Adding Protection, employee benefits and debt service brings four departments to 84.1% of the whole. The largest department is 313 times the size of the smallest.
What it rests on The twelve group totals the FY2025 omnibus prints, as shares of the grand total on the same page.
What it does not show What any department buys with it, or how many people it employs.
Ten of the twelve departments grew faster than the levy cap, not one of them
An argument about one department is an argument about part of the problem.
Every department in the voted budget except Central Purchasing and debt service outgrew the 2.5% the levy may rise by. Across the three years the town publishes department detail for, 10 of 12 departments grew faster than 2.5% a year. Only Central Purchasing, which is nearly flat, and maturing debt, which falls as bonds are paid off, did not. The budget rose 2.9% a year in total over the same period.
What it rests on The twelve group totals each omnibus prints, FY2023 against FY2025.
What it does not show Why any of them grew. An amount voted gives no reason for itself.
The schools are the biggest line in the budget and not the fastest growing one
Size and growth are different questions and the school line answers them differently.
At 57.1% of the budget the school line dominates the total, but eight departments grew faster than it did. The school appropriation grew 3.6% a year across the three years, which is slower than eight of the eleven departments that grew at all. What grew fastest of the large lines is employee benefits and reserves — seven tenths of it group health insurance — at 12.7% a year.
What it rests on Total Schools against the other eleven group totals, FY2023 to FY2025.
What it does not show What the school line buys, or whether it kept buying the same things.
Those are the answers this report could reach from the documents behind it. If the one you came for is not among them, ask us — no name or email needed.
What Town Meeting voted for every department, and which departments move the total.
Who gets the money
- Schools$25,127,554 · 57.1%
- Protection of persons & property$4,643,717 · 10.5%
- Employee benefits & reserves$4,293,123 · 9.8%
- Maturing Debt & Interest$2,941,322 · 6.7%
- Public Works$2,225,277 · 5.1%
- General Government$2,177,964 · 4.9%
- Facilities & Grounds$1,022,711 · 2.3%
- Library$583,890 · 1.3%
- Solid Waste & Recycling$469,775 · 1.1%
- Assistance$340,898 · 0.8%
- Health & Sanitation$117,819 · 0.3%
- Central Purchasing$80,300 · 0.2%
| department | FY2025 | share of the budget |
|---|---|---|
| Schools | $25,127,554 | 57.1% |
| Protection of persons & property | $4,643,717 | 10.5% |
| Employee benefits & reserves | $4,293,123 | 9.8% |
| Maturing Debt & Interest | $2,941,322 | 6.7% |
| Public Works | $2,225,277 | 5.1% |
| General Government | $2,177,964 | 4.9% |
| Facilities & Grounds | $1,022,711 | 2.3% |
| Library | $583,890 | 1.3% |
| Solid Waste & Recycling | $469,775 | 1.1% |
| Assistance | $340,898 | 0.8% |
| Health & Sanitation | $117,819 | 0.3% |
| Central Purchasing | $80,300 | 0.2% |
| all twelve | $44,024,349 | 100% |
Schools is the largest department and Central Purchasing the smallest — 313 times the size, in the same budget.
How each department is growing
- Assistance
- Central Purchasing
- Employee benefits & reserves
- Facilities & Grounds
- General Government
- Health & Sanitation
- Library
- Maturing Debt & Interest
- Protection of persons & property
- Public Works
- Schools
- Solid Waste & Recycling
Which departments outgrow the levy cap
Every department, every measure
| department | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | a year | share | above the cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee benefits & reserves | $3,378,711 | $3,968,170 | $4,293,123 | 12.7% | 9.8% | +$438,870/yr |
| Schools | $23,397,371 | $24,082,518 | $25,127,554 | 3.6% | 57.1% | +$284,306/yr |
| General Government | $1,792,492 | $1,974,322 | $2,177,964 | 10.2% | 4.9% | +$168,340/yr |
| Protection of persons & property | $4,239,355 | $4,478,848 | $4,643,717 | 4.7% | 10.5% | +$100,330/yr |
| Solid Waste & Recycling | $312,634 | $352,775 | $469,775 | 22.6% | 1.1% | +$94,340/yr |
| Facilities & Grounds | $884,566 | $981,645 | $1,022,711 | 7.5% | 2.3% | +$51,396/yr |
| Library | $492,984 | $539,126 | $583,890 | 8.8% | 1.3% | +$36,961/yr |
| Assistance | $294,404 | $335,082 | $340,898 | 7.6% | 0.8% | +$17,409/yr |
| Public Works | $2,101,445 | $2,168,288 | $2,225,277 | 2.9% | 5.1% | +$8,994/yr |
| Health & Sanitation | $99,260 | $104,961 | $117,819 | 8.9% | 0.3% | +$7,597/yr |
| Central Purchasing | $77,800 | $80,300 | $80,300 | 1.6% | 0.2% | −$728/yr |
| Maturing Debt & Interest | $4,497,723 | $3,518,013 | $2,941,322 | -19.1% | 6.7% | −$636,277/yr |
above the cap is the department’s own money times how far its growth exceeds the 2.5% the levy may rise by — dollars a year, and the ranking this page uses, because neither size nor rate means anything alone. The twelve net to $571,540 a year.
The voted total, FY2012 to FY2026
| fiscal year | voted | change |
|---|---|---|
| FY2012 | $26,582,152 | — |
| FY2013 | $27,489,441 | +3.4% |
| FY2014 | $28,177,263 | +2.5% |
| FY2015 | $29,079,384 | +3.2% |
| FY2016 | $32,025,895 | +10.1% |
| FY2017 | $33,802,328 | +5.5% |
| FY2018 | $35,690,394 | +5.6% |
| FY2019 | $36,804,409 | +3.1% |
| FY2020 | $38,058,164 | +3.4% |
| FY2021 | $38,658,115 | +1.6% |
| FY2022 | $39,864,899 | +3.1% |
| FY2023 | $41,568,745 | +4.3% |
| FY2024 | $42,584,049 | +2.4% |
| FY2025 | $44,024,349 | +3.4% |
| FY2026 | $49,374,465 | +12.2% |
Does it add up
The twelve group totals against the grand total the same page prints.
| fiscal year | twelve groups | printed total | difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2023 | $41,568,745 | $41,568,745 | -0.30 |
| FY2024 | $42,584,049 | $42,584,049 | nil |
| FY2025 | $44,024,349 | $44,024,349 | nil |
FY2023 is thirty cents short and the thirty cents are the town’s: it prints Total Health & Sanitation at $99,259.60 over five lines that come to $99,259.90, and foots its grand total on the correct figure rather than on the subtotal it printed.
What this cannot show
- What any department ASKED for. The omnibus is what Town Meeting voted, which is already balanced — the difference between a request and a vote is where a cut lives, and the annual report prints only the second.
- What was actually spent. Voted and spent are different quantities and rule 1 forbids mixing them in one calculation.
- Whether any department reduced SERVICE. A department can hold its dollars and cut its hours, and a dollar figure will not say so.
- Why any line moved. The omnibus states an amount and gives no reason for it, so every explanation of a movement here would be a hypothesis.
- Anything about FY2026 below the total. The FY2025 annual report prints no department figures at all.
- That growing faster than the levy cap is a problem. Proposition 2½ limits the LEVY, not the budget: the budget is the levy plus state aid, local receipts and transfers, and new growth raises the levy limit on top of the 2.5%. The cap is used here as a common reference point every board in town already uses — it is not a ceiling anybody breached.
Where it comes from
- The FY2023, FY2024 and FY2025 omnibus budgets, department by department — The annual town reports for FY2022, FY2023 and FY2024 — each prints the omnibus for the year AHEAD, as voted at that spring’s Town Meeting. Every one of these reconciles against every total the table prints about itself. FY2023 and FY2024 land on the town’s own +$0.80, recorded as an attested reading rather than a defect in ours.
- The voted total for every year from FY2012 to FY2025 — The GRAND TOTAL each annual report prints at the foot of its omnibus. A single printed figure per year. The department detail beneath it is only reconciled for the last three.
- The FY2026 total — Article 10 of the 3 May 2025 Annual Town Meeting, printed as prose on page 140 of the FY2025 annual report. No department table is printed for FY2026 in any form. The five funding sources the article names sum to the total exactly, which is the only check available on it, and it passes.
Where this came from
Nothing on this page is an official document. It was written here, from documents the town and district published and from records obtained by request, and it has not been reviewed or endorsed by the Town of Lunenburg, the School Committee, the Finance Committee or Lunenburg Public Schools. The report index says the same thing at more length, and lists every analysis alongside the data underneath it.
This page renders the document itself, which is the source of truth: there is one copy of every sentence and every figure here, not a transcription of one.
Every other report
Every analysis this project has written, in one index, is at reports.